We disagree with a criticism of Avatar
« AGAINST – in the heart of this endless westernien transposition (Cheyenne in the depths of the space), the pro-indian morality will take the shape of a big green « gloubiboulga » and of a pantheist crypto-miyazakienne ecstasy. » Aurélien Ferenczi from Télérama; 12th December 2009.
We don't agree with this terrible criticism about the spectacular movie of James Cameron, Avatar. The author seems to be quite embittered, almost envious. The critic always had a reputation of looser filmmaker. Thanks to this job, he can stay in the profession he dreamt of but as a spectator. A feeling of fustration appears and interferes with his objectivity. Then, if he uses a vocabulary that he only knows himself and is able to understand ... Yes, mister Ferenczi is the perfect example of this theory checked many times.
But actually we don't care about this point of view because us, we saw Avatar. Cameron impresses us with his technical innovation in this movie. Colors, special effects and 3D contribute to this planetary success. And we are not the only one who think that. Indeed, two weeks ago, Avatar officially broke the record of Titanic at the box-office, bringing in 1,8437 billion of dollars. Moreover, this movie won two Golden Globes and got nine nominations for the next Oscars. So, mister Ferenczi, what can you answer to that? Is it still a « gloubiboulga » to your mind? Whatever, for us, it's FOR, FOR and a million times FOR !!
TRZCINSKI Alexandra
SOUCASSE Manon